Sunday April 20, 2014

Last update09:23:58 AM PST

  • Warning: Your site is not using System - MooTools Upgrade (or compatible) plug-in. Many features, including the BBCode editor, may be broken.
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

fake beats by dre-The iPad is a different story. Apple features a more substantial lead
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: fake beats by dre-The iPad is a different story. Apple features a more substantial lead

fake beats by dre-The iPad is a different story. Apple features a more substantial lead 1 year ago #1105

  • oaqxk291
The apple company throws sand in competitors' gears, but they won't slow down
Apple is sending out legal teams around the globe to slow down competitors and protect its brand.
(Credit: Kimball Sand Company, Inc. )
Apple had its day in the U. S. court with a jury awarding the company more than $1 billion in a great overwhelming patent infringement victory over Samsung. After the presiding judge, Lucy Koh, finishes her examination of damages, the ultimate payout might actually climb higher. Some Samsung phones might even be prohibited from sale on this country (we'll find out the answer at a scheduled September 20 court hearing).
All of it sounds rosy for Apple, which was in an understandably celebratory mood after the jury delivered its verdict. Indeed,fake beats by dre, CEO Tim Cook told his employees that Apple values "originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the most effective products on earth. And we do this to delight our customers, not for competitors to be able to flagrantly copy. "
But while the headlines tell one story, there's another scenario which could unfold, one in which Apple's court win ends up as a Pyrrhic victory. As should they needed a reminder, the lopsided court victory sends a wake up call to rivals, which includes Samsung, Motorola (Google), HTC, Nokia, RIM, and Microsoft. All have quivers full of patents and plenty of cash to attend court to protect their interests.
Over time, most phones and tablets will have similar models and behaviors, just like PCs and laptops, or TVs, cars, and newspapers. Rounded or rectangular corners and square icons aren't tips of differentiation, despite Cook's charge of flagrant copying by competitors.
Samsung took the shortest approach to competing with the iPhone when it was first introduced by copying some of its characteristics. That expedient business decision factored heavily in the jury's guilty verdict,fake beats by dre studio for sale, and it could cost the South Korean company some dough. Samsung would probably make the same decision if it had a do-over so that it didn't fall past an acceptable limit behind Apple, as RIM and Nokia did, and now will file an appeal to the verdict and always dominate the smartphone market along with Apple.
Complete coverage: Apple v. Samsung, a battle over billions
According to IDC statistics for your second quarter of 2012, Samsung had 32. 6 percent share of the worldwide market regarding smartphones, compared with 17 percent in the same quarter a year earlier. Apple had of sixteen. 9 percent share, down from 18. 8 during that same period.
Google's Android -- which can be free to partners like Samsung -- not Apple's iOS, dominates the overall smartphone market. In respect IDC, Android had 68. 1 percent share of the worldwide smartphone market in the next quarter of 2012, up from 46. 9 percent a year earlier, compared with Apple's of sixteen. 9 percent share. However, Apple is extracting enormous profits compared with Samsung and others having its less than 20 percent share of market.
The iPad is a different story. Apple features a more substantial lead, with more than double the share of competing Android tablets, according to be able to Gartner. Apple could directly attack Google over patent infringements in Android, but that could acquire years to play out; in the meantime, Google can trot out patents that it gained from purchasing Motorola Mobility to get a counterattack. In the end, it's more likely that all legal entanglements will lead to more cross-licensing agreements than to massive payouts -- though there isn't any guarantee that scenario will prevail.
Apple's greatest fear is that competitors will create a better smartphone or tablet, or that it will deliver a new mobile device to the market that grossly doesn't meet user expectations. Despite its incredible success over the last few years -- Apple could be the most valuable public firm on Wall Street as measured by market capitalization -- the company still conducts business like it was competing for its life. It's part of the Steve Jobs legacy, from purchasing when it was Apple against a world dominated by Microsoft.
Patent suits are ways to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt among competitors, and to tout the uniqueness of the The apple company products. The Apple v. Samsung verdict should force competitors to pivot and act on the notion that the ultimate way to throw sand in Apple's gears is to out-innovate, rather than imitate, the company.
Samsung's more modern Galaxy S3and HTC's One X, for example, leapfrog Apple's iPhone in some areas. Google's Android mobile platform is probably not as polished and innovative as Apple's iOS, but Google has a lot of creative engineering resources which it could apply to competing more effectively with Apple, and not tread on its patents. Microsoft's Windows 8 could take a bite out of Apple next few years.
Apple has every right to be paranoid, and the company will always throw as much sand as possible into the face of any rival that might endanger its future.
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 1.41 seconds
You are here: Forum